TIME TO CHANGE GEAR
“He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.”
John McCarthy (computer pioneer, Stanford University).
This note is in response to the CBI paper with the above title published in February 2009.
..........................................................................................................
Over the past decade the traffic engineers have restricted capacity at the most critical points in the road network, namely the junctions. They have done that by a series of minor, almost insignificant, measures e.g.
Those measures are in response to the dash for road safety and the green “equality for all” mantra - walking first (open to poor and rich alike), followed by cycling, then by buses plus trains and lastly by cars (to which the poor have less access than do the rich).
The effect has been devastating. For example, a one minute delay to 1,000 vehicles each day costs circa £82,000 per year (a). Similarly a daily one kilometre diversion, at a speed of 25 mph, forced on 1,000 vehicles generates an annual cost of £180,000 (b).
Nationally there are about 23 billion car trips per year. Their average length is 8.5 miles. If all of those, plus the journeys of other vehicles, suffer a two minute delay, because of these schemes, then the cost attributable to the schemes is circa £11 billion annually(c).
We believe that the green mantra and the drive to “get people out of cars onto buses and trains” are entirely misplaced. The plain fact is that the car has enabled a dispersed land use that is impossible to serve by bus or train. If it were otherwise that land use would have arisen in the past but it did not. Consider the numbers.
The target in the Government’s 10 year plan was to increase rail use by 50% and bus use by 10%. That, it was hoped, would greatly reduce road congestion. It was supported by, if not the brainchild of, the Commission for Integrated Transport, chaired by Professor Begg.
However, that policy did not take account of the blindingly obvious, namely that the bus and train each accounted for only 6% of the passenger-miles travelled. Indeed, rail accounts for less than 2% of passenger-journeys. Hence, it was inevitable that, even if the targets could be met, there would be little impact on the increase in car use, which has in fact grown by 10%. The figure below illustrates the point. There the difference in car use that the policy may generate is difficult to discern.
Figure 1 Passenger-km % base year
If that were not enough to illustrate the naked stupidity of the plan, consider the history. In 1955, the bus and train (including London Underground) accounted for about 60% of the passenger-miles travelled. Today, 85% are by the car. Furthermore, passenger-miles by car have increased sevenfold. The figure below illustrates these overwhelming changes.
Figure 2 Passenger-km per head by mode (d)
Despite that billions of pounds have been spent on the presumption that congestion really could be solved by getting people out of cars and on to public transport.
Those wishing to claim success will point to the increase in train usage that has occurred over the decade. However, the percentage of passenger-miles by national rail remains close to 6%. Further, since rail serves destinations that are difficult to reach by car and the car serves journeys impossible to make by rail, the probability is that very few people have transferred from one mode to the other. Instead, at great cost to the nation, we have encouraged typically rich people to commute relatively long distances by rail, thereby establishing lifestyles that can be sustained only by massive public subsidy.
With regard to buses, outside London there has been a 10% decline in usage. That will be because of rising car ownership and because employment and retail have deserted town centres in favour of places that cannot be served effectively by bus, let alone the train. Ironically, that dispersal of land use has been encouraged by well-meaning policies such as limiting car parking in town centres and charging excessively for it. Congestion charging, if it becomes wide-spread, may very well accelerate that trend and the consequential decline in bus use.
The reality is that the car, the second most expensive purchase any family makes, is the principal and preferred way of meeting the travel requirements of the population. The bus and train (especially the London underground), are only major players in our larger towns and cities, and only for journeys to and from the centres. Even in London, outside the centre, the car accounts for 70% of motorised trips, probably 80% of passenger-miles.
As for the speed cameras, we find that since their introduction the long established decline in the deaths has flattened off instead of accelerating despite the cameras being supported by many thousands of speed humps and the traffic management measures that have so damaged the capacity of the road network.
Furthermore, it has been put about that 30% of accidents are due to “speed” or “inappropriate speed”. However, only a trivial proportion of accidents are attributed to “speeding” (e) (which is narrowly defined as breaking the speed limit). Consequently, despite the official rhetoric, the potential for the cameras to save lives scarcely exists.
As to “the environment” – a subsidised bus with as many as 5 passengers aboard is more damaging than many types of car containing the driver alone.
If the attack on the motorist is misplaced then the belief that the pubic has in rail is sufficient to beggar belief. For example, it is put about that rail is overwhelmingly safe compared with road transport, has the higher capacity to move people, and is in some magical way sustainable and green. However, our detailed calculations show, among other, that:
Picture courtesy of National News & Pictures |
Astonishingly, even in the peak hour and in central London this immense rail network, offering 10,000 miles of superbly engineered right of way, is, in highway terms, substantially disused. Indeed, averaged over the network as a whole the flow per track is equivalent to a pitiful 300 coaches plus lorries per day, a flow that would not trouble one lane of a motor road for more than 30 minutes (i).
Meanwhile the subsidy from the taxpayer is vast. Over the 20 years to 2015 £100 billion will have been spent. That amounts to circa £4,000 for every household in the land at a time when half of us use a train less than once a year and when those from the top quintile of household income travel five times as far by rail as do those from either of the bottom two quintiles.
This extraordinary misallocation of funds coupled with the war on the motorist arises because policy has been developed in defiance of the facts. That can only change if there is a solid group of experienced people who will lobby down the years if favour of the truth rather than fairy stories.
Notes: